With reference to the escape clauses under the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act, 2003 (as amended in 2018), consider the following statements: 1. The escape clause allows the government to exceed the annual fiscal deficit target by a maximum of 0.5 percentage points of GDP. 2. Severe collapse of agriculture and structural reforms with unanticipated fiscal implications are valid grounds to invoke the escape clause. 3. The escape clause can be invoked unilaterally by the Finance Minister without any obligation to table a statement in Parliament explaining the deviation. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Options:
- A: 1 only
- B: 1 and 2 only
- C: 2 and 3 only
- D: 1, 2 and 3
Related Practice Questions:
- Let $S_1$ and $S_2$ be two disjoint, non-empty convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$. Under which of the following conditions is there guaranteed to exist a hyperplane that strictly separates $S_1$ and $S_2$?
- Let the primal linear programming problem be: Maximize $Z = c^T x$ subject to $Ax \le b, x \ge 0$. If this primal problem has an unbounded optimal objective value, then which of the following statements is always true regarding its dual problem?
- Let $S = \{(x, y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 \mid x^2 + y^2 \le 9\}$ be a convex set in $\mathbb{R}^2$. The set of all extreme points of $S$ is given by:
- In a linear programming problem with $3$ independent equality constraints and $5$ variables (including slack/surplus variables), what is the maximum possible number of basic solutions?