In the landmark Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) case, what was the Supreme Court's ruling regarding the constitutional validity of Article 31C?
Options:
- A: It declared the entire Article 31C as unconstitutional and void.
- B: It upheld the entire Article 31C, including the clause that barred judicial review.
- C: It upheld the first part of Article 31C but declared the second part, which barred judicial review, as unconstitutional.
- D: It ruled that Article 31C is only applicable during a state of National Emergency.
Related Practice Questions:
- Let $S_1$ and $S_2$ be two disjoint, non-empty convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$. Under which of the following conditions is there guaranteed to exist a hyperplane that strictly separates $S_1$ and $S_2$?
- Let the primal linear programming problem be: Maximize $Z = c^T x$ subject to $Ax \le b, x \ge 0$. If this primal problem has an unbounded optimal objective value, then which of the following statements is always true regarding its dual problem?
- Let $S = \{(x, y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 \mid x^2 + y^2 \le 9\}$ be a convex set in $\mathbb{R}^2$. The set of all extreme points of $S$ is given by:
- In a linear programming problem with $3$ independent equality constraints and $5$ variables (including slack/surplus variables), what is the maximum possible number of basic solutions?