In the landmark Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) case, what was the Supreme Court's ruling regarding the constitutional validity of Article 31C?

Options:

  • A: It declared the entire Article 31C as unconstitutional and void.
  • B: It upheld the entire Article 31C, including the clause that barred judicial review.
  • C: It upheld the first part of Article 31C but declared the second part, which barred judicial review, as unconstitutional.
  • D: It ruled that Article 31C is only applicable during a state of National Emergency.

Related Practice Questions: