Consider the following statements regarding the structural differences between the Planning Commission and NITI Aayog: 1. The Planning Commission had the power to allocate funds to ministries and state governments, whereas NITI Aayog is a policy think-tank with no financial allocation powers. 2. The Governing Council of NITI Aayog includes all State Chief Ministers and Lieutenant Governors of Union Territories, whereas the Planning Commission did not have such direct structural representation of states. 3. Both the Planning Commission and NITI Aayog are non-constitutional, non-statutory bodies created by executive resolutions. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Options:
- A: 1 and 2 only
- B: 1, 2 and 3
- C: 2 and 3 only
- D: 1 and 3 only
Related Practice Questions:
- Let $S_1$ and $S_2$ be two disjoint, non-empty convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$. Under which of the following conditions is there guaranteed to exist a hyperplane that strictly separates $S_1$ and $S_2$?
- Let the primal linear programming problem be: Maximize $Z = c^T x$ subject to $Ax \le b, x \ge 0$. If this primal problem has an unbounded optimal objective value, then which of the following statements is always true regarding its dual problem?
- Let $S = \{(x, y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 \mid x^2 + y^2 \le 9\}$ be a convex set in $\mathbb{R}^2$. The set of all extreme points of $S$ is given by:
- In a linear programming problem with $3$ independent equality constraints and $5$ variables (including slack/surplus variables), what is the maximum possible number of basic solutions?