Given below are two statements, one labeled as Assertion (A) and the other labeled as Reason (R).\n\n **Assertion (A):** In Vishakhadatta's Mudrarakshasa, Chanakya's victory over Minister Rakshasa is achieved through reconciliation and diplomatic alignment rather than military destruction.\n **Reason (R):** Chanakya believed that the stability of the newly established Mauryan Empire required the administrative expertise and loyalty of the old Nanda loyalists like Rakshasa.\n\n In the context of the above statements, which of the following is correct?
Options:
- A: Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- B: Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- C: (A) is true but (R) is false.
- D: (A) is false but (R) is true.
Related Practice Questions:
- Let $S_1$ and $S_2$ be two disjoint, non-empty convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$. Under which of the following conditions is there guaranteed to exist a hyperplane that strictly separates $S_1$ and $S_2$?
- Let the primal linear programming problem be: Maximize $Z = c^T x$ subject to $Ax \le b, x \ge 0$. If this primal problem has an unbounded optimal objective value, then which of the following statements is always true regarding its dual problem?
- Let $S = \{(x, y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 \mid x^2 + y^2 \le 9\}$ be a convex set in $\mathbb{R}^2$. The set of all extreme points of $S$ is given by:
- In a linear programming problem with $3$ independent equality constraints and $5$ variables (including slack/surplus variables), what is the maximum possible number of basic solutions?