With reference to the 'Doctrine of Eclipse' under Article 13(1) of the Indian Constitution, consider the following statements: 1. The Doctrine of Eclipse applies to pre-constitutional laws which become inconsistent with Fundamental Rights. 2. Such inconsistent laws are void-ab-initio (void from the very beginning) and are completely wiped off the statute book. 3. If the relevant Fundamental Right is amended subsequently, the eclipsed law becomes active and enforceable again. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Options:

• A: 1 and 2 only
• B: 1 and 3 only
• C: 2 and 3 only
• D: 1, 2 and 3

Related Practice Questions:

• Let $S_1$ and $S_2$ be two disjoint, non-empty convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$. Under which of the following conditions is there guaranteed to exist a hyperplane that strictly separates $S_1$ and $S_2$?
• Let the primal linear programming problem be: Maximize $Z = c^T x$ subject to $Ax \le b, x \ge 0$. If this primal problem has an unbounded optimal objective value, then which of the following statements is always true regarding its dual problem?
• Let $S = \{(x, y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 \mid x^2 + y^2 \le 9\}$ be a convex set in $\mathbb{R}^2$. The set of all extreme points of $S$ is given by:
• In a linear programming problem with $3$ independent equality constraints and $5$ variables (including slack/surplus variables), what is the maximum possible number of basic solutions?