The conquest of the Deccan during the Mauryan period is a subject of historical debate. Which of the following arguments best supports the theory that Bindusara, rather than Chandragupta Maurya or Ashoka, was the primary conqueror of the Deccan?
Options:
- A: The discovery of Ashokan minor rock edicts in Karnataka proves that Ashoka personally led the military campaigns to conquer the Deccan.
- B: Greek sources explicitly state that Bindusara crossed the Vindhyas with a massive army of 600,000 men to annex the Deccan.
- C: Ashoka's Rock Edicts mention only Kalinga as his sole conquest, while Chandragupta was preoccupied with the northwestern borders and Seleucus I, leaving the southern conquests to Bindusara.
- D: The Arthashastra of Kautilya was written specifically to guide Bindusara's southern military campaigns.
Related Practice Questions:
- Let $S_1$ and $S_2$ be two disjoint, non-empty convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$. Under which of the following conditions is there guaranteed to exist a hyperplane that strictly separates $S_1$ and $S_2$?
- Let the primal linear programming problem be: Maximize $Z = c^T x$ subject to $Ax \le b, x \ge 0$. If this primal problem has an unbounded optimal objective value, then which of the following statements is always true regarding its dual problem?
- Let $S = \{(x, y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 \mid x^2 + y^2 \le 9\}$ be a convex set in $\mathbb{R}^2$. The set of all extreme points of $S$ is given by:
- In a linear programming problem with $3$ independent equality constraints and $5$ variables (including slack/surplus variables), what is the maximum possible number of basic solutions?