In which of the following aspects does the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 227 differ fundamentally from its writ jurisdiction under Article 226?

Options:

• A: Article 226 can be invoked suo motu by the High Court, whereas Article 227 can only be invoked upon an application by an aggrieved party.
• B: Article 226 is primarily remedial and curative of individual grievances, whereas Article 227 is both administrative and judicial, aimed at keeping subordinate courts within their bounds of authority.
• C: Article 227 allows the High Court to act as a court of appeal to re-appreciate evidence, whereas Article 226 does not permit any such re-appreciation.
• D: Article 226 extends to military tribunals, whereas Article 227 is completely restricted to civil courts only.

Related Practice Questions:

• Let $S_1$ and $S_2$ be two disjoint, non-empty convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$. Under which of the following conditions is there guaranteed to exist a hyperplane that strictly separates $S_1$ and $S_2$?
• Let the primal linear programming problem be: Maximize $Z = c^T x$ subject to $Ax \le b, x \ge 0$. If this primal problem has an unbounded optimal objective value, then which of the following statements is always true regarding its dual problem?
• Let $S = \{(x, y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 \mid x^2 + y^2 \le 9\}$ be a convex set in $\mathbb{R}^2$. The set of all extreme points of $S$ is given by:
• In a linear programming problem with $3$ independent equality constraints and $5$ variables (including slack/surplus variables), what is the maximum possible number of basic solutions?