Consider the following statements comparing the Attorney General of India and the Advocate General of a State:\n\n1. Both offices are constitutional posts created under Part V and Part VI of the Constitution of India respectively.\n2. Both officers enjoy the privileges and immunities of a member of the respective legislature (Parliament and State Legislature) they are associated with.\n3. While the Attorney General is appointed by the President, the Advocate General is appointed by the Governor of the State.\n\nWhich of the statements given above are correct?
Options:
- A: 1 and 2 only
- B: 2 and 3 only
- C: 1 and 3 only
- D: 1, 2 and 3
Related Practice Questions:
- Let $S_1$ and $S_2$ be two disjoint, non-empty convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$. Under which of the following conditions is there guaranteed to exist a hyperplane that strictly separates $S_1$ and $S_2$?
- Let the primal linear programming problem be: Maximize $Z = c^T x$ subject to $Ax \le b, x \ge 0$. If this primal problem has an unbounded optimal objective value, then which of the following statements is always true regarding its dual problem?
- Let $S = \{(x, y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 \mid x^2 + y^2 \le 9\}$ be a convex set in $\mathbb{R}^2$. The set of all extreme points of $S$ is given by:
- In a linear programming problem with $3$ independent equality constraints and $5$ variables (including slack/surplus variables), what is the maximum possible number of basic solutions?